Categories: Mental health

Comparative analysis of algorithm-guided treatment and predefined duration treatment programmes for depression: exploring cost-effectiveness using routine care data

Background

More knowledge on the cost-effectiveness of various depression treatment programmes can promote efficient treatment allocation and improve the quality of depression care.


Objective

This study aims to compare the real-world cost-effectiveness of an algorithm-guided programme focused on remission to a predefined duration, patient preference-centred treatment programme focused on response using routine care data.


Methods

A naturalistic study (n=6295 in the raw dataset) was used to compare the costs and outcomes of two programmes in terms of quality-adjusted life years (QALY) and depression-free days (DFD). Analyses were performed from a healthcare system perspective over a 2-year time horizon. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated, and the uncertainty of results was assessed using bootstrapping and sensitivity analysis.


Findings

The algorithm-guided treatment programme per client yielded more DFDs (12) and more QALYs (0.013) at a higher cost (3070) than the predefined duration treatment programme. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were around 256/DFD and 236 154/QALY for the algorithm guided compared with the predefined duration treatment programme. At a threshold value of 50 000/QALY gained, the programme had a probability of <10% of being considered cost-effective. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of these findings.


Conclusions

The algorithm-guided programme led to larger health gains than the predefined duration treatment programme, but it was considerably more expensive, and hence not cost-effective at current Dutch thresholds. Depending on the preferences and budgets available, each programme has its own benefits.


Clinical implication

This study provides valuable information to decision-makers for optimising treatment allocation and enhancing quality of care cost-effectively.

prince

Share
Published by
prince

Recent Posts

Best Air Purifiers in the UK for Managing Asthma

I’ve been toying with the idea of getting an air purifier for my home for…

1 week ago

Minimally important change on the Columbia Impairment Scale and Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in youths seeking mental healthcare

Background Evidence-based mental health requires patient-relevant outcome data, but many indicators lack clinical meaning and…

1 week ago

Multigenerational family coaggregation study of obsessive-compulsive disorder and cardiometabolic disorders

Background Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is associated with an increased risk of morbidity and mortality due…

2 weeks ago

Comparing apples and oranges in youth depression treatments? A quantitative critique of the evidence base and guidelines

Objectives Should a young person receive psychotherapy or medication for their depression and on what…

2 weeks ago